Experience Summary
A synopsis of our prior experience
- 150+ Litigation Matters
- 250+ Expert Reports
- 50+ Depositions/Trial Testimonies
- 50+ Years of Experience
Cyberonix consultants have supported counsel on more than 150 litigation matters, contributing over 250 expert reports and testifying in more than 50 depositions and trials. Engagements span patent, trade secret, copyright, breach of contract, and class action disputes.
Many of these matters center on source code. Our experts review code under protective orders, reconstruct engineering histories from repositories and project records, and explain their findings in expert reports, depositions, and trial testimony, from early case assessment through trial.
Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
- Retaining party: Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC
- Venue: Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
- Case No.: 2:23-CV-439
- Counsel: Ahmad, Zavitsanos & Mensing, PLLC
- Nature of suit: Intellectual Property – Patent
- Case outcome: $78.5M jury verdict
Wapp Tech Limited Partnership and Wapp Tech Corp v. Seattle Spinco, Inc., et al.
Wapp Tech Limited Partnership and Wapp Tech Corp v. Wells Fargo
Wapp Tech Limited Partnership and Wapp Tech Corp v. Bank of America
- Retaining party: Wapp Tech Limited Partnership and Wapp Tech Corp
- Venue: Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
- Case No.: 4:18-cv-00469-ALM; 4:18-cv-00501-ALM; 4:18-cv-00519-ALM
- Counsel: Feinberg Day Kramer Alberti Lim Tonkovich & Belloli LLP
- Nature of suit: Intellectual Property – Patent
- Case outcome: $172M jury verdict
GoTV Streaming LLC v. Netflix
- Retaining party: GoTV Streaming LLC
- Venue: Central District of California
- Case No.: 2-22-CV-07556
- Counsel: Ahmad, Zavitsanos, Anaipakos, Alavi, and Mensing P.C.
- Nature of suit: Intellectual Property – Patent
- Case outcome: Cyberonix was retained by GoTV Streaming to offer infringement and validity opinions in this matter. The jury found that Netflix infringed GoTV Streaming’s wireless technology patents. (Law360 coverage)
United Services Automobile Association v. PNC Bank N.A.
- Retaining party: United Services Automobile Association
- Venue: Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division; USPTO PTAB
- Case No.: 2:20-CV-00319-JRG
- Inter Partes Review No: IPR2021-01248, IPR2021-01163
- Counsel: Irell & Manella LLP
- Nature of suit: Intellectual Property – Patent
- Case outcome: Cyberonix was retained by USAA on counterclaims asserted by PNC Bank in district court, as well as its expert in the IPR proceedings. The jury found that USAA did not infringe PNC Bank’s patents, and the PTAB later invalidated the asserted patents. (Law360 coverage; Bloomberg coverage)
Ford Motor Company v. Versata Software, Inc., F/K/A Trilogy Software, Inc.
- Retaining party: Versata Software, Inc., F/K/A Trilogy Software, Inc.
- Venue: Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division
- Case No.: 15-10628-MFL-EAS (consolidated with 15-11624-MFL-EAS)
- Counsel: Winston and Strawn LLP; Ahmad, Zavitsanos, Anaipakos, Alavi, and Mensing P.C.
- Nature of suit: Intellectual Property – Patent and Trade Secret
Re: FormsNet LLC v. Glide Labs Inc.
- Retaining party: Glide Labs Inc.
- Venue: Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco
- Case No.: CGC-21-588988
- Counsel: Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP
- Nature of suit: Intellectual Property – Trade Secret
Financial Information Technologies Inc. v. IControl Systems, USA, LLC
- Retaining party: IControl Systems
- Venue: Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division
- Case No.: 8:17-cv-190-T-23MAP
- Counsel: Rocke McLean Sbar
- Nature of suit: Intellectual Property – Trade Secret
Ford Motor Company v. Versata Software, Inc., F/K/A Trilogy Software, Inc.
- Retaining party: Versata Software, Inc., F/K/A Trilogy Software, Inc.
- Venue: Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division
- Case No.: 15-10628-MFL-EAS (consolidated with 15-11624-MFL-EAS)
- Counsel: Winston and Strawn LLP; Ahmad, Zavitsanos, Anaipakos, Alavi, and Mensing P.C.
- Nature of suit: Intellectual Property – Patent and Trade Secret
- Case outcome: $105 million jury verdict
HEALTHeSTATE LLC v. The United States, ASM Research
- Retaining party: The United States
- Venue: The United States Court of Federal Claims
- Case No.: 18-034
- Counsel: United States Department of Justice
- Nature of suit: Intellectual Property – Copyright
Miants, LLC, et al. v. Kevin Lasser, et al.
- Retaining party: Miants LLC.
- Venue: State of Michigan, Oakland County Circuit Court
- Case No.: 2013-133695-CK
- Counsel: Mantese, Honigman, Rossman & Williamson, P.C.
- Nature of suit: Intellectual Property – Copyright
Warner Records, Inc., et al. v. Altice USA, Inc., et al.
- Retaining Party: Warner Music Group, Sony Music and Entertainment, Sony Music Publishing
- Venue: Eastern District of Texas
- Case No.: 2:23-cv-576-JRG-RSP
- Counsel: Oppenheim & Zebrak, LLP
- Nature of suit: Intellectual Property – Copyright
BMG Rights Management (US), LLC, UMG Recordings, Inc, Capitol Records, LLC, Concord Music Group, Inc., and Concord Bicycle Assets, LLC v. Altice USA, Inc, and CSC Holdings, LLC Retaining party: BMG Rights Management (US), LLC, et al.
- Venue: Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
- Case No.: 2:22-CV-471-JRG
- Counsel: Steptoe LLP
- Nature of suit: Intellectual Property – Copyright
The Hertz Corporation v. Accenture LLP
- Retaining party: Accenture LLP
- Venue: Southern District of New York
- Case No.: 1:19-cv-03508-WHP
- Counsel: Wiggin and Dana LLP
- Nature of suit: Breach of Contract
Entri LLC v. GoDaddy.com LLC
- Retaining party: Entri LLC
- Venue: Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division
- Case No.: 1:24-cv-0069-AJT-WEF
- Counsel: McGuireWoods LLP
- Nature of suit: Antitrust; Breach of Contract; Computer Fraud and Abuse
Chrome Systems Inc. v. Internet Brands Inc., Autodata Solutions Inc., et al.
- Retaining party: Chrome Systems Inc.
- Venue: Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc.
- Case No.: 1340012931
- Counsel: Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
- Nature of suit: Intellectual Property – Software License
Lotchinbek Samatov, Jakhongir Samatov, and SSD Software Solutions v. AirShowBuzz
- Retaining party: Lotchinbek Samatov, Jakhongir Samatov, and SSD Software Solutions
- Venue: Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles Central District
- Case No.: BC488092
- Counsel: Michelman & Robinson LLP
- Nature of suit: Breach of Contract
Matter of Position Mobile Ltd SEZC
- Retaining Party: Technology Investment Consortium, LLC
- Venue: Grand Court of the Cayman Islands
- Case No.: FSD 79 OF 2022 (DDJ)
- Counsel: Dinner Martin Attorneys t/a Dentons
- Nature of suit: Breach of Contract; Intellectual Property – Trade Secret
HOV Services Inc. v. ASG Technologies Group Inc.
- Retaining party: HOV Services Inc.
- Venue: Southern District of New York
- Case No.: 1:18-cv-09780-PKC
- Counsel: Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP
- Nature of suit: Breach of Contract, Software License, and Copyright
Austin Recht et al. v. TikTok Inc. (f/k/a Musical.ly, Inc.); ByteDance Inc.; Beijing Douyin Information Service Co. Ltd. a/k/a ByteDance Technology Co. Ltd.; and Douyin Ltd. a/k/a ByteDance Ltd.
- Retaining party: Austin Recht et al.
- Venue: Central District of California
- Case No.: 2:22-cv-8613
- Counsel: Baron and Budd, P.C.
- Nature of suit: Class Action
Alexander Yershov v. Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc. d/b/a USA Today
- Retaining party: Gannett Satellite Information Network
- Venue: District of Massachusetts
- Case No.: 1:14-cv-13112
- Counsel: ZwillGen PLLC
- Nature of suit: Class Action
Lenovo Adware Litigation
- Retaining party: Lenovo
- Venue: Northern District of California, San Jose Division
- Case No.: 5:15-md-02624-RMW
- Counsel: K&L Gates
- Nature of suit: Class Action
Trama et al. v. RELX PLC et al.
- Retaining Party: Trama et al. on behalf of class
- Venue: Central District of California
- Case No.: 2:24-cv-03174-DSF-E
- Counsel: Susman Godfrey LLP
- Nature of suit: Class Action
Benjamin Strusowski et al. v. The Nemours Foundation
- Retaining party: Strusowski et al.
- Venue: Eastern District of Pennsylvania
- Case No.: 2:23-CV-00537
- Counsel: Bursor & Fisher, P.A.
- Nature of suit: Class Action